Curves and coherent Prüfer rings

Curves and coherent Prüfer rings

Usual definitions of Dedekind domain are not well suited for an algorithmic treatment. Indeed, the notion of Noetherian rings is subtle from a constructive point of view, and to be able to get prime ideals involve strong hypotheses. For instance, if k is a field, even given explicitely, there is in general no method to factorize polynomials in k[X]. The work [2] analyses the notion of Dedekind ...

On n-coherent rings, n-hereditary rings and n-regular rings

We observe some new characterizations of $n$-presented modules. Using the concepts of $(n,0)$-injectivity and $(n,0)$-flatness of modules, we also present some characterizations of right $n$-coherent rings, right $n$-hereditary rings, and right $n$-regular rings.

on n-coherent rings, n-hereditary rings and n-regular rings

we observe some new characterizations of $n$-presented modules. using the concepts of $(n,0)$-injectivity and $(n,0)$-flatness of modules, we also present some characterizations of right $n$-coherent rings, right $n$-hereditary rings, and right $n$-regular rings.

Tilting Theory for Coherent Rings and Almost Hereditary Noetherian Rings

We generalize two major ways of obtaining derived equivalences, the tilting process by Happel, Reiten and Smalø and Happel’s Tilting Theorem, to the setting of finitely presented modules over right coherent rings. Moreover, we extend the characterization of quasi–tilted artin algebras as the almost hereditary ones to all right noetherian rings. We also give a streamlined and general presentatio...

Some Results on Coherent Rings